Cultural Differences, Work, and Play

Some interesting cultural differences came up at a Halloween party I was at last night: A friend of a friend (just came over to America from South Korea about 2 months ago, and who is now a grad student at UCLA) commented “I’ve gone to the library to study a couple times, and I’ve noticed something: there are no Americans who study there. Everyone there is International (and primarily Asian).” The group pondered for a while about this, trying to explain it.

The couple of native east Asian students in the group swore that it was because school and life is so much more competitive over there, so the students must “be trying their their hardest at all times”. I’m not entirely sure about this, though–given my experiences in Taiwan, I’ve seen plenty of Taiwanese slackers (no matter how studious they may claim to be ;) ). Only their procrastination was sleeping-while-pretending-to-study, as opposed to the American talking-while-pretending-to-study.

I think different cultures have different levels of dichotomy between “work” and “play”. I suspect East Asia to be on the more highly dichotomized end, America to be on the not-so-dichotomized end (A friend once remarked to me about the vast number of American figures of speech that were sports- or game-related. These things overflow their boundaries and seep into every aspect of our lives). Me, I look at how I study, and it’s in coffee shops, with friends if I can. And, while I do get work done, it doesn’t hurt if studying “degenerates” into conversation for a while. Heck, I remember preparing for AP tests back in high-school–spending the afternoon in coffee shops, or at Del Taco with friends and books and free refills of Mr. Pibb–or in large groups over at classmates houses, with study sessions that degenerated into parties.

And what’s the upshot of all this? There are huge differences both studying mentalities and the entire educational systems from culture to culture. But, while the student-products of different cultural systems might have their different trends in strengths and weaknesses, I think most students end up at equivalent levels once it’s all done. And (yes, I realize this might be considered crass in our culture of pluralism and tolerance, but I don’t care! ;) ), I think that our way is better. I think it’s a shame that my Taiwanese friends had their childhoods stolen as they attended cram schools after regular classes, every day until 5 or 7pm. My elementary school let out at 1:45pm, and (because I usually did all my homework in class) I spent the afternoons free, riding my bike, playing my old 8-bit Nintendo, and building “fortresses” in the hills down at the end of the street where I lived. And now I compare where we all ended up, and I see no benefit to their system of over-work compared to ours.

And does this apply to the rest of life outside of school? I remember reading a book by B.F. Skinner (the psychologist who pioneered reinforcement and behavior conditioning), a utopian novel named Walden II. In his society, everyone worked 20 or 30 hour work-weeks. And they were as productive as 40-hour workers. His theory was that so much of our time “at work” is really spent like those students in the libraries back in Taiwan–we spend just as much time pretending to work as actually getting work done. Eliminate the guilt and responsibility of an impossibly-heavy load, and we’ll get just as much done and be happier for it. Now, I don’t know if this would actually work (lost productivity is caused by laziness (communism) even more than it is by overwork-stress (capitalism) ), but it’s an interesting idea.

One last thought: when most people think of Eden, of Paradise, they imagine hammocks and drinks with umbrellas in them. They imagine carefree days relaxing. The Eden in Genesis was not exactly like this–Adam and Eve were placed in the garden to work. Paradise, as the ancient Hebrews held, had elbow-grease as an integral component. And I can understand this–there is something about doing a good job, or working a task to completion, that is deeply fulfilling. There is something innately good about work, that makes it just as good as relaxation. Now, some degree of relaxation is necessary–thus the Hebrew notion of Sabbath–but relaxation alone is not the sole component of Paradise.

Here in America–look at the post-dot-com-bubble 60 hour workweek–I wonder if we picture paradise as relaxation because we’ve binged on work…

Ramayani

Ramayani has the best Indonesian food in Los Angeles

About 10 minutes south of UCLA on westwood. Atmosphere semi-casual; dinner entrees ~10-12; awesome desserts; very authentic.

Ramayani Westwood
310-477-3315
1777 Westwood Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90024-5607

Python?

It’s time for the Big Code Port. Moving away from Java and into something else more easily linked in with our existing project (UnrealScript and Python). Options were C,C++,Python,C#. C++ is an old standby, but Python shows intriguing promise. The downside is I don’t know it yet, but the upside is that it’s one of those “always wanted to learn this” things.

Resource dump:

I’m excited about Python, especially the glowing words Paul Graham has for it. I’m not excited about the whitespace-based syntax of Python or the loss of the wonderful dev environment of Java in Eclipse… Definitely not excited about porting my 15k lines of code, or however many i’ve put into the current (soon-to-be-prior) manifestation of my project.

Blogging your Research

danah, this morning, during our workshop in social software in academia, brought up blogs as a tool for PhD students. This is quite a new thing (though, given the quantity and average age of livejournallers and the like, it will be much more common and established 10 years from now). Many aspects to think about:

  • Blogs as a record and outboard-brain. This is what really draws me to it. I already keep reading notes and class notes on my own, why not put them up on the web, where I can access them from anywhere–and, as an emergent bonus, to get commentary on my own commentary.
  • This makes the private public. Good if an informed public can add to your work in an on-subject manner. Bad if a half-informed public adds a lot of noise. Scary if your qual panel is informed about all the dirty little weaknesses to your theories.
  • Good because it can force you to present things more coherently, and therefore think about things more thoroughly–no taking shortcuts when you’re not the only one reading what you’ve written
  • Need to develop a different voice for doing this (honest but politic), especially in analysis rather than just summary.
  • To be continued…

From now on, it goes down under this link.

Drowning in Data

Wired had a good article about the pictures we take with digital cameras, and how hard it is to archive them in usable form.

It reminds me of when my roommate back in my first year of gradschool finally got a digital camera. He was so excited about his new toy that he went around the apartment taking pictures of everything–including his trash can. The contrast between his world and the world of my great-grandparents (or, more precisely, the contrast betwen me looking back on my great-grandparents’ world and his future-great-grandchildren looking back to his and my world) was striking. My great-grandmother passed away a few months ago, at a day shy of her 104th birthday. If I want to explore about her life, the only resources I have is a few old letters she saved from her childhood, yellowed picture albums and far more yellowed newspaper clippings.
My old roommate’s future descendants, though, could be potentially drowning in information. Every email he’d ever written, thousands (by that time, millions) of pictures he’s taken, ranging in importance from a picture of he and his yet-unmet bride eating their wedding cake together, to a picture of his trash can, taken upon the second day of purchasing a digital camera.
(I first thoughta bout this a long time ago)

There’s a couple lines from a T.S. Eliot poem, “The Rock” which, taken out of context, fit all this very well:

Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?

The future of information (really, the future of data, from which information must first be gleaned before it can then be distilled into knowledge (and can we ever really hope for wisdom?)) relies on being able to filter what we need from the dross. Google surprised us all by showing that search was better than manual labelling. Why construct a knowledge ontology (like the one Cyc uses) documenting in prepositional logic the birth- and death-date of George Washington? Why bother when a google search can at it without me having to extend the manpower-hours constructing such a database.

The Wired article says that, as far as images go, it’s a problem of associating the right metadata to the each data. The final page of the article lays out a number of solutions to the data-lacking-metadata problem. Manual tagging, cameras writing standardized metadata, data mining of personal computer info, AI-driven image recognition, and that wonderful would-be-panacea called “Social Networks” that are supposed to save the world (if we ever find a use for it, but that’s another blog entry…).

I hazard to guess that the future is not in manual tagging, or anything relying on humans to rote-annotate data. With all respect for the niche del.icio.us has brought us, I think Google has taught us the strength of smart algorithms running on top of lots of data–that its utility can easily surpass human-driven annotation. We’ve had those algorithms for analyzing text for a while now–natural langauge processing is built on the shoulders those techniques–now we need the goods for images.

A couplet of Xhan’s (taken out of context, too), fits both with this situation (and, ironically, with the Eliot’s original context in The Rock):

This is twenty first century light, and the
darkness never seemed to shine so bright

back

Back from Ft. Bragg, NC. Was gone this last week administering an evaluation of our Tactical Language Training System to some soldiers (U.S. Army) there. Honestly, I was quite impressed with the patience and discipline of the soldiers–they sat through 4 days, 6 hours a day, of buggy language-teaching software, and gave us over 1G of data to use.

Now, though, I’m faced with the daunting task of settling back into life. After this last week’s evaluation and the prior month’s frantic preparing for the eval, I have about 3 weeks worth of webcast classes I need to watch (~8 hours), and plenty of reading.

Not to mention settling back in to the apartment, and catching up with a good couple weeks of household errands and bill paying… Busy, busy…