Comments on: Ads in RSS Feeds http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/ Disclaimer: The following web space does not contain my own opinions, merely linguistic representations thereof. Sun, 13 Mar 2011 07:12:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.1 By: nick http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-551 Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:24:02 +0000 http://fairuz.isi.edu/blog/index.php/archives/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/#comment-551 Nick Douglas is right in the most semantically narrow sense–these rss ads *are* more like banner ads than spam. I guess I was that these rss ads were “atomic pieces of information that increase the noise-to-signal ratio, for monetary gain”. And that’s what I consider spam.

Not that I don’t want to support BoingBoing–but give me the option for micropayments or click-thrus for your banner ads any day–RSS ads in my feedreader client *feel* too much like spams in my email client even if they aren’t exactly the same animal.

]]> By: Nick Douglas http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-548 Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:16:01 +0000 http://fairuz.isi.edu/blog/index.php/archives/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/#comment-548 Site-supporting ads aren’t spam. They’re made by the creator you subscribed to. The appropriate analogy is banner ads — an annoyance, but one more valid than spam.

]]> By: Paul http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-547 Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:15:21 +0000 http://fairuz.isi.edu/blog/index.php/archives/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/#comment-547 I agree with you

]]>