<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ads in RSS Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/</link>
	<description>Disclaimer: The following web space does not contain my own opinions, merely linguistic representations thereof.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuz.isi.edu/blog/index.php/archives/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Nick Douglas is right in the most semantically narrow sense--these rss ads *are* more like banner ads than spam.  I guess I was that these rss ads were &quot;atomic pieces of information that increase the noise-to-signal ratio, for monetary gain&quot;.  And that&#039;s what I consider spam.

Not that I don&#039;t want to support BoingBoing--but give me the option for micropayments or click-thrus for your banner ads any day--RSS ads in my feedreader client *feel* too much like spams in my email client even if they aren&#039;t exactly the same animal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Douglas is right in the most semantically narrow sense&#8211;these rss ads *are* more like banner ads than spam.  I guess I was that these rss ads were &#8220;atomic pieces of information that increase the noise-to-signal ratio, for monetary gain&#8221;.  And that&#8217;s what I consider spam.</p>
<p>Not that I don&#8217;t want to support BoingBoing&#8211;but give me the option for micropayments or click-thrus for your banner ads any day&#8211;RSS ads in my feedreader client *feel* too much like spams in my email client even if they aren&#8217;t exactly the same animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Douglas</title>
		<link>http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuz.isi.edu/blog/index.php/archives/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Site-supporting ads aren&#039;t spam. They&#039;re made by the creator you subscribed to. The appropriate analogy is banner ads -- an annoyance, but one more valid than spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site-supporting ads aren&#8217;t spam. They&#8217;re made by the creator you subscribed to. The appropriate analogy is banner ads &#8212; an annoyance, but one more valid than spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://motespace.com/blog/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairuz.isi.edu/blog/index.php/archives/2005/02/04/ads-in-rss-feeds/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>I agree with you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
